Diagnostic code 6100Verified

Hearing impairment

VA assigns Roman numerals I through XI from authorized audiometric testing, then combines the better and poorer ear designations in Table VII. These are the possible Table VII percentage outputs, not an automatic result.

Auditoryhearing lossbilateral hearing loss
Add to Claim Planner
Official schedule

Percentage levels and criteria

Plain-language summaries explain the text; they do not decide whether any level applies.

100%
Official criteria
A Table VII intersection of the better-ear and poorer-ear Roman numeral designations that produces a 100 percent evaluation
Plain-language summary

Table VII can produce 100% after each ear is assigned a Roman numeral under Table VI or VIa and exceptional patterns under § 4.86 are applied when required.

A state-licensed audiologist must conduct the examination using the Maryland CNC speech-discrimination test and puretone audiometry. The app does not calculate the Roman numerals.

90%
Official criteria
A Table VII intersection of the better-ear and poorer-ear Roman numeral designations that produces a 90 percent evaluation
Plain-language summary

Table VII can produce 90% after each ear is assigned a Roman numeral under Table VI or VIa and exceptional patterns under § 4.86 are applied when required.

A state-licensed audiologist must conduct the examination using the Maryland CNC speech-discrimination test and puretone audiometry. The app does not calculate the Roman numerals.

80%
Official criteria
A Table VII intersection of the better-ear and poorer-ear Roman numeral designations that produces a 80 percent evaluation
Plain-language summary

Table VII can produce 80% after each ear is assigned a Roman numeral under Table VI or VIa and exceptional patterns under § 4.86 are applied when required.

A state-licensed audiologist must conduct the examination using the Maryland CNC speech-discrimination test and puretone audiometry. The app does not calculate the Roman numerals.

70%
Official criteria
A Table VII intersection of the better-ear and poorer-ear Roman numeral designations that produces a 70 percent evaluation
Plain-language summary

Table VII can produce 70% after each ear is assigned a Roman numeral under Table VI or VIa and exceptional patterns under § 4.86 are applied when required.

A state-licensed audiologist must conduct the examination using the Maryland CNC speech-discrimination test and puretone audiometry. The app does not calculate the Roman numerals.

60%
Official criteria
A Table VII intersection of the better-ear and poorer-ear Roman numeral designations that produces a 60 percent evaluation
Plain-language summary

Table VII can produce 60% after each ear is assigned a Roman numeral under Table VI or VIa and exceptional patterns under § 4.86 are applied when required.

A state-licensed audiologist must conduct the examination using the Maryland CNC speech-discrimination test and puretone audiometry. The app does not calculate the Roman numerals.

50%
Official criteria
A Table VII intersection of the better-ear and poorer-ear Roman numeral designations that produces a 50 percent evaluation
Plain-language summary

Table VII can produce 50% after each ear is assigned a Roman numeral under Table VI or VIa and exceptional patterns under § 4.86 are applied when required.

A state-licensed audiologist must conduct the examination using the Maryland CNC speech-discrimination test and puretone audiometry. The app does not calculate the Roman numerals.

40%
Official criteria
A Table VII intersection of the better-ear and poorer-ear Roman numeral designations that produces a 40 percent evaluation
Plain-language summary

Table VII can produce 40% after each ear is assigned a Roman numeral under Table VI or VIa and exceptional patterns under § 4.86 are applied when required.

A state-licensed audiologist must conduct the examination using the Maryland CNC speech-discrimination test and puretone audiometry. The app does not calculate the Roman numerals.

30%
Official criteria
A Table VII intersection of the better-ear and poorer-ear Roman numeral designations that produces a 30 percent evaluation
Plain-language summary

Table VII can produce 30% after each ear is assigned a Roman numeral under Table VI or VIa and exceptional patterns under § 4.86 are applied when required.

A state-licensed audiologist must conduct the examination using the Maryland CNC speech-discrimination test and puretone audiometry. The app does not calculate the Roman numerals.

20%
Official criteria
A Table VII intersection of the better-ear and poorer-ear Roman numeral designations that produces a 20 percent evaluation
Plain-language summary

Table VII can produce 20% after each ear is assigned a Roman numeral under Table VI or VIa and exceptional patterns under § 4.86 are applied when required.

A state-licensed audiologist must conduct the examination using the Maryland CNC speech-discrimination test and puretone audiometry. The app does not calculate the Roman numerals.

10%
Official criteria
A Table VII intersection of the better-ear and poorer-ear Roman numeral designations that produces a 10 percent evaluation
Plain-language summary

Table VII can produce 10% after each ear is assigned a Roman numeral under Table VI or VIa and exceptional patterns under § 4.86 are applied when required.

A state-licensed audiologist must conduct the examination using the Maryland CNC speech-discrimination test and puretone audiometry. The app does not calculate the Roman numerals.

0%
Official criteria
A Table VII intersection of the better-ear and poorer-ear Roman numeral designations that produces a 0 percent evaluation
Plain-language summary

Table VII can produce 0% after each ear is assigned a Roman numeral under Table VI or VIa and exceptional patterns under § 4.86 are applied when required.

A state-licensed audiologist must conduct the examination using the Maryland CNC speech-discrimination test and puretone audiometry. The app does not calculate the Roman numerals.

Source record

38 CFR § 4.85—Evaluation of hearing impairment

38 CFR § 4.85, DC 6100 · Effective Jun 10, 1999 · Reviewed Jul 24, 2026

Open official eCFR source
Continue planning

Use this record without sharing private data